0.00/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.11	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.11/0.32	% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
0.11/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.11/0.32	% WCLimit    : 240
0.11/0.32	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:27:49 EDT 2025
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.46	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.19/0.48	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bj0qvilK0G/E---3.1_16880.p
0.94/0.60	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.94/0.60	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHFA.
0.94/0.60	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.94/0.60	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.94/0.60	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores
0.94/0.60	# Starting sh10 with 240s (1) cores
0.94/0.60	# Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 240s (1) cores
0.94/0.60	# new_ho_10_unif with pid 16959 completed with status 0
0.94/0.60	# Result found by new_ho_10_unif
0.94/0.60	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHFA.
0.94/0.60	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.94/0.60	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.94/0.60	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores
0.94/0.60	# No SInE strategy applied
0.94/0.60	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-MHFFFSBC
0.94/0.60	# partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHFFFSBC
0.94/0.60	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.94/0.60	# Starting additional_ho_6 with 130s (1) cores
0.94/0.60	# additional_ho_6 with pid 16962 completed with status 0
0.94/0.60	# Result found by additional_ho_6
0.94/0.60	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHFA.
0.94/0.60	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.94/0.60	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.94/0.60	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores
0.94/0.60	# No SInE strategy applied
0.94/0.60	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-MHFFFSBC
0.94/0.60	# partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHFFFSBC
0.94/0.60	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.94/0.60	# Starting additional_ho_6 with 130s (1) cores
0.94/0.60	# Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
0.94/0.60	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.94/0.60	
0.94/0.60	# Proof found!
0.94/0.60	# SZS status Theorem
0.94/0.60	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_sort1, type, nat: $tType).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_sort2, type, list_c1059388851t_unit: $tType).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_sort3, type, config256849571t_unit: $tType).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_23, type, minus_minus_nat: nat > nat > nat).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_24, type, one_one_nat: nat).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_27, type, last_c571238084t_unit: list_c1059388851t_unit > config256849571t_unit).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_28, type, nil_co1338500125t_unit: list_c1059388851t_unit).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_29, type, nth_co1649820636t_unit: list_c1059388851t_unit > nat > config256849571t_unit).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_30, type, size_s1406904903t_unit: list_c1059388851t_unit > nat).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_33, type, fe: nat > list_c1059388851t_unit).
0.94/0.60	thf(decl_35, type, n: nat).
0.94/0.60	thf(conj_0, conjecture, ((last_c571238084t_unit @ (fe @ n))=(nth_co1649820636t_unit @ (fe @ n) @ (minus_minus_nat @ (size_s1406904903t_unit @ (fe @ n)) @ one_one_nat))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bj0qvilK0G/E---3.1_16880.p', conj_0)).
0.94/0.60	thf(fact_4_last__conv__nth, axiom, ![X24:list_c1059388851t_unit]:((((last_c571238084t_unit @ X24)=(nth_co1649820636t_unit @ X24 @ (minus_minus_nat @ (size_s1406904903t_unit @ X24) @ one_one_nat)))<=((X24)!=(nil_co1338500125t_unit)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bj0qvilK0G/E---3.1_16880.p', fact_4_last__conv__nth)).
0.94/0.60	thf(fact_0_FeNNotEmpty, axiom, ((fe @ n)!=(nil_co1338500125t_unit)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bj0qvilK0G/E---3.1_16880.p', fact_0_FeNNotEmpty)).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((last_c571238084t_unit @ (fe @ n))!=(nth_co1649820636t_unit @ (fe @ n) @ (minus_minus_nat @ (size_s1406904903t_unit @ (fe @ n)) @ one_one_nat))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X24:list_c1059388851t_unit]:((((X24)!=(nil_co1338500125t_unit))=>((last_c571238084t_unit @ X24)=(nth_co1649820636t_unit @ X24 @ (minus_minus_nat @ (size_s1406904903t_unit @ X24) @ one_one_nat))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_4_last__conv__nth])).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((fe @ n)!=(nil_co1338500125t_unit)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_0_FeNNotEmpty])).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((last_c571238084t_unit @ (fe @ n))!=(nth_co1649820636t_unit @ (fe @ n) @ (minus_minus_nat @ (size_s1406904903t_unit @ (fe @ n)) @ one_one_nat))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X801:list_c1059388851t_unit]:((((X801)=(nil_co1338500125t_unit))|((last_c571238084t_unit @ X801)=(nth_co1649820636t_unit @ X801 @ (minus_minus_nat @ (size_s1406904903t_unit @ X801) @ one_one_nat))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((fe @ n)!=(nil_co1338500125t_unit)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((last_c571238084t_unit @ (fe @ n))!=(nth_co1649820636t_unit @ (fe @ n) @ (minus_minus_nat @ (size_s1406904903t_unit @ (fe @ n)) @ one_one_nat))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X24:list_c1059388851t_unit]:((((X24)=(nil_co1338500125t_unit))|((last_c571238084t_unit @ X24)=(nth_co1649820636t_unit @ X24 @ (minus_minus_nat @ (size_s1406904903t_unit @ X24) @ one_one_nat))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((fe @ n)!=(nil_co1338500125t_unit)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.94/0.60	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_11]), ['proof']).
0.94/0.60	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.94/0.60	# Parsed axioms                        : 231
0.94/0.60	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.94/0.60	# Initial clauses                      : 516
0.94/0.60	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 33
0.94/0.60	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 483
0.94/0.60	# Processed clauses                    : 560
0.94/0.60	# ...of these trivial                  : 8
0.94/0.60	# ...subsumed                          : 160
0.94/0.60	# ...remaining for further processing  : 392
0.94/0.60	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 49
0.94/0.60	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.94/0.60	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.94/0.60	# Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.94/0.60	# Generated clauses                    : 92
0.94/0.60	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 63
0.94/0.60	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.94/0.60	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.94/0.60	# Paramodulations                      : 43
0.94/0.60	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.94/0.60	# NegExts                              : 0
0.94/0.60	# Equation resolutions                 : 49
0.94/0.60	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.94/0.60	# Total rewrite steps                  : 46
0.94/0.60	# ...of those cached                   : 28
0.94/0.60	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.94/0.60	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.94/0.60	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.94/0.60	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.94/0.60	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.94/0.60	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.94/0.60	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.94/0.60	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.94/0.60	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.94/0.60	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.94/0.60	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.94/0.60	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.94/0.60	# Current number of processed clauses  : 44
0.94/0.60	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
0.94/0.60	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
0.94/0.60	#    Negative unit clauses             : 20
0.94/0.60	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
0.94/0.60	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 283
0.94/0.60	# ...number of literals in the above   : 1401
0.94/0.60	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.94/0.60	# Current number of archived clauses   : 299
0.94/0.60	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24618
0.94/0.60	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3394
0.94/0.60	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 142
0.94/0.60	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 78
0.94/0.60	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.94/0.60	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 17
0.94/0.60	# BW rewrite match successes           : 11
0.94/0.60	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.94/0.60	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.94/0.60	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 51283
0.94/0.60	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 8766
0.94/0.60	
0.94/0.60	# -------------------------------------------------
0.94/0.60	# User time                : 0.094 s
0.94/0.60	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.94/0.60	# Total time               : 0.098 s
0.94/0.60	# Maximum resident set size: 3776 pages
0.94/0.60	
0.94/0.60	# -------------------------------------------------
0.94/0.60	# User time                : 0.101 s
0.94/0.60	# System time              : 0.006 s
0.94/0.60	# Total time               : 0.107 s
0.94/0.60	# Maximum resident set size: 2056 pages
0.94/0.60	% E exiting
0.94/0.60	% E exiting
0.94/0.60	EOF